(via the Illinois Federation of Teachers)
The members of the Illinois Federation of Teachers are eager to return to in-person instruction, but we have grave concerns for the safety of our students, their families and communities, and the educators of this state. We believe that some types of in-person instruction can be achieved with health and safety mitigation, but absent a practical safety plan that includes the guidance below and incorporates a clear line of responsibility and enforcement, we call for the 2020-2021 school year to begin with remote learning.
We thank our members for their dedication, passion, and commitment during these trying times. Even though school buildings were closed, educators never stopped working and doing what we know and love while juggling families, children, and anxieties of the future. We want to be back with our students, but it must be done as safely as possible.
Since schools, colleges, and universities transitioned to remote learning in March, the IFT has made it a priority to ensure that all plans to return to in-person instruction prioritize health and safety, are grounded in science, and follow the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) guidelines.
Even though Illinois’ current COVID-19, positivity rate has improved over the past several months, the rate is currently unstable and, in some regions, clearly on the rise. This trend indicates that surges of COVID-19 spread, infections and deaths are still a very real threat, as acknowledged by both Governor JB Pritzker and Dr. Ngozi Ezike in their statements on July 15. In their guidance for the return to in-person instruction in the fall, the Illinois Board of Higher Education (IBHE), the Illinois Community College Board (ICCB), and the Illinois State Board of Education (ISBE) have acknowledged the obligation and need to protect students and staff from COVID-19 infection. In fact, in their “Part 3 – Transition Joint Guidance” the ISBE and IDPH have stated that the transition back to in-person learning should be done, “while holding paramount the health and safety of students and communities.” Schools are a type of congregate setting that are proven to be high risk for spread of the disease. Therefore, the following must be considered:
Schools and campuses are designed to bring together large numbers of people in enclosed, inconsistently ventilated, indoor spaces for hours at a time.
According to a July 10 Kaiser Family Foundation Study, 24% of all educators are particularly susceptible to the virus due to underlying health conditions.
Black and Brown students (who make up more than 43% of our P-12 student statewide population, 37% of our community college population, and 31% of our Institution of Higher Education) and their families face healthcare disparities that have made them more likely to suffer ill effects from the new coronavirus.
According to a July 11, 2020, article in the New York Times citing the CDC, we still don’t know enough about how the virus affects children nor how likely they are to transmit the virus to adults.
The obvious challenge inherent in ensuring that all students and staff are wearing masks, washing hands, and maintaining social distance as consistently as necessary to create a safe environment.
The concern that educational agency guidance calls for social distancing in P-12 merely “as much as possible.”
The contact tracing program is not fully functioning with only 15% of the estimated 3,800 contact tracers that a state of our size would require.
The CDC lists full return to in-person instruction to be the highest risk category for schools.<